His Holiness seeks to move the Catholic Church to a stance of non-belligerence, if not neutrality, in the culture war for the soul of the West.
Non-belligerence is the absence of war-like and aggressive behavior.
I am trying to wrap my head around this article. It is a bad thing that the leader of the church that worships what it calls the “Prince of Peace” has advocated for (wonder among wonders) PEACE? We must chastize the Pope for not engaging in war-like behavior? When did Pat Buchanan believe he was better than the Pope anyway?
The Pope is all infallible until he does something Christ-like, as in not be a testosterone-ridden, bigotry spouting, douchebag. Then anyone can criticize him.
From all the criticism I get for being a feminist, I am going to assume that means I am engaging in non-douchebaggery. Yeah.